FB pixel

MSGE wins dismissal of biometric data privacy law allegations

MSGE wins dismissal of biometric data privacy law allegations
 

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has succeeded in getting a lawsuit over its use of facial recognition to bar attorneys involved in litigation against it dismissed.

The suit under New York City’s Biometric Identifier Information Code accused MSGE of profiting from the use of the biometric technology, as it acted as a deterrent to litigation against the company.

MSGE deployed facial recognition to identify attorneys with law firms involved in litigation against the venue operator, prompting a spat that became public last January. MSGE CEO James Dolan threatened on live television to dox the state liquor authority’s chairman when it looked into whether the use of facial recognition to bar some patrons violated alcohol sales license conditions.

A previous bid to have the case dismissed was partially rejected in January by the District Court for the Southern District of New York. Claims of unjust enrichment and civil rights violations were tossed at the time, leaving only the claim that it violated a prohibition on profiting from biometrics.

That claim has now been dismissed, on grounds that the only “transaction” that could violate the Code is the contract with the vendor to use the technology, or the transmission of data to it for matching. In neither case did MSGE profit, in the sense carried by the Code, according to the decision.

“As objectionable as defendant’s use of biometric data may be, it does not – at least on the facts alleged – violate” the municipal law, District Court Judge Lewis A. Kaplan wrote in the ruling.

“The biometric data sharing at issue here is no different from any other tool for which a company may pay a vendor,” Kaplan explained. “To say that a company profits when it purchases a product or service defies common sense.”

Law360 notes that New York’s Supreme Court overturned a previous decision that MSGE could not use facial recognition to enforce its ban against attorneys.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometric Update, Goode Intelligence release 2026 IAD report

Biometric Update and Goode Intelligence have released the “2026 Injection Attack Detection Market Report & Buyer’s Guide,” a new industry…

 

App store age brackets power California age assurance law, but where’s the proof?

California’s Digital Age Assurance Act may reshape how online services handle age data, but critics argue the law stops short…

 

Ghana joins growing list of countries pursuing online age verification

The Ghanaian government is working on a policy that would mandate age verification for access to age-restricted services like online…

 

Zambia deepens digital sovereignty push with Huawei AI partnership

The Zambian government is banking on a new partnership with Chinese tech giant Huawei to power digital government services across…

 

Australia builds enforcement layer behind age assurance laws

Australia is moving beyond age assurance mandates toward a broader legal framework designed to hold online platforms accountable for harms…

 

India pushes for strategic autonomy in biometrics, DPI and AI

Governments are increasingly pursuing technological sovereignty as concerns grow around dependence on foreign AI, cloud and biometric infrastructure. S. Krishnan,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events