FB pixel

Belgian watchdog ruling on consent sets employee biometrics use against GDPR

Belgian watchdog ruling on consent sets employee biometrics use against GDPR
 

A Belgian company has been fined 45,000 euros (US$48,185) for using a fingerprint-based employee time tracking system with the country’s data watchdog ruling that the firm did not obtain valid consent from its employees, putting it in violation of GDPR rules.

The Belgian Data Protection Authority (DPA) issued the ruling in September after receiving a complaint from a former employee of the unnamed company. The data watchdog concluded that the company relied on employee consent as a legal ground for processing data. However, the firm is unlikely to have obtained valid consent to the processing due to the imbalance of power between the employer and the workers, the agency ruled. The employer also did not provide an alternative method for time registration.

The decision could dampen the use of biometric systems for time recording or protecting company assets, according to PwC Legal in Belgium.

“We imagine that this decision, although justifiable in view of the prohibition of biometric data, will come as a thunderbolt for many companies that use this type of security to protect their critical infrastructure or trade secrets,” the law firm says in its case study.

In 2020, the company introduced a time registration system using fingerprints for around 200 of its employees. The system was procured from an unnamed subsidiary of an international group with headquarters in Japan.

The employee submitted the complaint against the company to the Belgian DPA in March 2022, claiming he was not informed about where or how long his biometric data was being stored or whether it was transferred to third parties.

The Belgian DPA also stated that the company failed to respect data minimization rules as collecting biometric data was unnecessary for time registration –  less intrusive measures could have sufficed. In addition, the employer did not conduct a mandatory data protection impact assessment nor implement GDPR-compliant measures.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Opinions on UK Online Safety Act emphasize importance of enforcement

Online safety legislation is making headlines around the world. But in places where laws have taken effect, are they proving…

 

UK Home Office raises estimate for passport contract to 12 years, £576M

The UK Home Office has opened a third round of market engagement for its next major passport manufacturing and personalization…

 

US lawmakers move to restrict AI chatbots used by kids

A bipartisan pair of House and Senate bills would impose new federal restrictions on AI chatbots, including a ban on…

 

Utah age assurance law for VPN users takes effect this week

Privacy advocates and virtual private network (VPN) providers are up in arms over Utah’s Senate Bill 73 (SB 73), “Online…

 

CLR Labs wins ISO 17025 accreditation for biometrics testing across EU

Cabinet Louis Reynaud (CLR Labs) has been accredited for ISO/IEC 17025, the international standard for testing and calibration laboratories, in…

 

Leidos, Idemia PS advance checkpoint modernization with biometrics, CAT-2 systems

Leidos and Idemia Public Security have formed a strategic partnership to deploy biometric‑enabled eGates and integrated Credential Authentication Technology (CAT-2)…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events