FB pixel

Belgian watchdog ruling on consent sets employee biometrics use against GDPR

Belgian watchdog ruling on consent sets employee biometrics use against GDPR
 

A Belgian company has been fined 45,000 euros (US$48,185) for using a fingerprint-based employee time tracking system with the country’s data watchdog ruling that the firm did not obtain valid consent from its employees, putting it in violation of GDPR rules.

The Belgian Data Protection Authority (DPA) issued the ruling in September after receiving a complaint from a former employee of the unnamed company. The data watchdog concluded that the company relied on employee consent as a legal ground for processing data. However, the firm is unlikely to have obtained valid consent to the processing due to the imbalance of power between the employer and the workers, the agency ruled. The employer also did not provide an alternative method for time registration.

The decision could dampen the use of biometric systems for time recording or protecting company assets, according to PwC Legal in Belgium.

“We imagine that this decision, although justifiable in view of the prohibition of biometric data, will come as a thunderbolt for many companies that use this type of security to protect their critical infrastructure or trade secrets,” the law firm says in its case study.

In 2020, the company introduced a time registration system using fingerprints for around 200 of its employees. The system was procured from an unnamed subsidiary of an international group with headquarters in Japan.

The employee submitted the complaint against the company to the Belgian DPA in March 2022, claiming he was not informed about where or how long his biometric data was being stored or whether it was transferred to third parties.

The Belgian DPA also stated that the company failed to respect data minimization rules as collecting biometric data was unnecessary for time registration –  less intrusive measures could have sufficed. In addition, the employer did not conduct a mandatory data protection impact assessment nor implement GDPR-compliant measures.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Growing role of biometrics in everyday life demands urgent deepfake response

Biometrics are becoming more entrenched a couple of market segments, though not as fast as some would like. The top…

 

PNG expands mandatory digital ID to businesses taking gov’t contracts

The government of Papua New Guinea is making its national digital ID a mandatory form of authentication for all business…

 

Imply reaches face biometrics milestone at tech-forward Arena da Baixada

Imply Tecnologia’s facial recognition model has enabled more than 1 million accesses at Arena da Baixada, the home of Club…

 

Following IPO, ROC is investing in homegrown security for US market

In February, Colorado-based biometrics and vision AI provider ROC closed the first big biometrics IPO of 2026, raising just over…

 

Jumio expanding biometric reusable digital identity across LatAm

Following a launch in Brazil last year, U.S.-based Jumio is expanding its face biometrics-based reusable digital identity product, selfie.DONE, across…

 

Denmark imposes age checks to restrict social media to kids under 15

Welcome two more Europeans nations to the global age assurance legislation party. The Danish government is moving ahead with an…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events