FB pixel

Microsoft tweaks security across platforms with MFA, sign-in change

Mandatory MFA aims to strengthen account security. So why leave users signed in?
Microsoft tweaks security across platforms with MFA, sign-in change
 

Microsoft has announced a patch for the critical authentication bypass by spoofing flaw in its Azure AI Face service. MSSP Alert says that the face biometrics vulnerability has been fixed and was not exploited by bad actors.

The mega-company is clamping down on security in the face of escalating cyber attacks targeting facial biometric authentication. Last year it announced that multi-factor authentication (MFA) was to become mandatory for Azure sign-ins. Its website’s learning portal has an article on how to plan for mandatory MFA measures, which outlines the scope of enforcement, implementation and enforcement.

Businesses using Microsoft Entra can use various options to enable MFA for users, including Microsoft Authenticator, which facilitates sign-in approvals through biometrics, one-time passcodes, FIDO2 security keys, certificate-based authentication, passkeys, and SMS or voice approval.

An internal survey by Microsoft revealed that multi-factor authentication can block over 99.2 percent of account compromise attacks.

Of note to biometric authentication and digital identity providers is the following section:

“Support for external MFA solutions is in preview with external authentication methods, and can be used to meet the MFA requirement.”

Users express strong opinions on change to account sign-in

Seemingly on the other end of the security spectrum, Microsoft is moving to keep users signed-in to accounts unless they sign out or use private browsing. As noted in a piece in The Verge, “it’s a change that people will need to be aware of, especially if they’re using a public computer.”

At present, Microsoft always asks users if they want to stay signed in.

No reason is given for the change, but user comments suggest some vexation.

“How is it that the largest software company in the world, that’s been around for 50 years, sucks so bad at everything it does?” asks one.

Another, who claims to work in IT, prefers bluntness to inquiry: “This actually sucks big time.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Norway overhauls immigration system through six-year digital transformation

Norway is embarking on a six-year program to rebuild its immigration system from the ground up, replacing decades-old platforms with…

 

Court records detail Clearview AI’s role in ICE protest surveillance

Newly disclosed court records show Homeland Security Investigations used Clearview AI facial recognition as one element of a broader undercover…

 

Liberia advances PPP-backed digital ID rollout with OSD

Liberia is moving ahead with the public-private partnership outlined by National Identification Registry (NIR) Executive Director Andrew Peters in an…

 

Nigeria extends national digital ID into cooperative sector with Seamfix

Nigeria is extending its national digital identity ecosystem into the country’s cooperative sector with a new biometric registry that will…

 

Meta’s WhatsApp age-check trial faces challenge from India’s digital ID plans

Meta is testing age confirmation on WhatsApp ahead of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, but draft implementation rules…

 

Thai regulators propose linking Roblox to national digital ID for age assurance

While it has surely been a busy few months for compliance teams at every large social media company, a special…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events