FB pixel

Poor biometrics options, understanding of DNA hindering UK refugee reunification

King’s College report recommends policy, training upgrades
Poor biometrics options, understanding of DNA hindering UK refugee reunification
 

Officials with the UK Home Office responsible for decisions on refugee family reunification are struggling to understand key points about DNA comparisons, including the probabilistic nature of DNA analysis, according to a new report.

The report from King’s Legal Clinic at King’s College London (KCL) on refugee family reunification (RFR) notes challenges for applicants caused by “extensive and onerous evidential requirements, significant procedural delays, onerous biometric requirements in particular in inaccessible regions,” and difficulties related to DNA evidence.

The Refugee Family Reunion report’s publication follows a workshop KCL hosted with participation from the British Red Cross, the Refugee Council, Safe Passage, UNHCR, IRAP, Pathways International, the Home Office, Refugee & Migrant Forum of Essex and London (RAMFEL), and Refugee Legal Support.

DNA testing poses a financial and logistical burden for applicants, the report says, and when completed, officials often seek 100 percent certainty that is “not scientifically feasible.”

The report authors recommend Home Office consider alternative biometric solutions so people in areas without facilities for biometrics data collection can apply without extensive travel, and waivers could be applied to the biometrics requirement in some situations. Training for decision-makers who review DNA reports should also be increased, they say.

The report cites KCL Professor Syndercombe Court’s argument “that while DNA testing can be invaluable for establishing familial links, it is not without limitations and complexities, which can inadvertently hinder families seeking reunification. While DNA testing is a critical tool for establishing familial relationships, it cannot provide absolute certainty.”

DNA testing standards are also somewhat inconsistent despite the high fees paid by applicants.

The UK government, meanwhile, continues to struggle with the twin challenges of government digitization and immigration control.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Leidos wins $130M FBI contract to support CJIS biometric services program

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has awarded Leidos a five-and-a-half year $129.7 million contract to support its Criminal Justice…

 

Deepfakes are testing the limits of American governance

Under the looming omnipresence of AI, the United States finds itself at a crossroads in determining how best to regulate…

 

Move in House to block state AI laws draws bipartisan fire; Senate support questionable

The U.S. House of Representatives this week passed a sweeping budget reconciliation package that includes a controversial provision that would…

 

Mom sues porn sites for noncompliance with Kansas age assurance law

You can mess with the law – but don’t mess with the moms who catch their sons in compromising acts….

 

Spike in first party fraud could presage raging storm of generative AI

The latest version of LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ annual Cybercrime Report shows what a release calls “a significant swing in the…

 

Digital ID, payments providers are trying to solve eIDAS ambiguities

The EU has been busy building a regulatory foundation for its European Digital Identity (EUDI), which will be offered to…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events