FB pixel

Latest NIST age estimation test shows gains by Cognitec, Idemia, Innovatrics, Yoti

‘Further evidence that estimation has a role to play alongside verification
Latest NIST age estimation test shows gains by Cognitec, Idemia, Innovatrics, Yoti
 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has posted fresh test results on its benchmark for facial age estimation technologies. Added in the new report are algorithms from Cognitec, Idemia, Innovatrics and Yoti

Other biometrics providers submitting new algorithms to the NIST Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE): Age Estimation and Verification this year include Dermalog and Daon.

Yoti scored the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for ages 13 to 16, while Idemia’s algorithm had the lowest False Positive Rate (FPR) in the Challenge 25 task’s “application” and “border” categories. Cognitec landed in the top 5 in the Challenge 25 “application,” Age 13-16 MAE and Ages 8-12 FPR categories. Innovatrics sits 6th and 4th in the two Challenge 25 categories, and 7th in FPR for Ages 17-22.

An announcement from Dresden, Germany-based Cognitec says that in the latest evaluation, “averaging the rankings across two genders and all six regions, Cognitec achieves the best rank overall.”

“Ordering the algorithms by the average of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) rates over all genders and regions also puts Cognitec’s algorithm in the top position.”

Yoti, meanwhile, claims success in the Child Online Safety rankings, where its algorithm occupies the top spot for MAE at 2.0182. Writing on LinkedIn, Yoti CEO Robin Tombs notes the significance of their score for 13-16 years olds: “NIST publish our 13-16 MAE as 2.06 years, significantly ahead of most other vendors. The 10th best vendor has an MAE of 3.86 years.”

In a comment quoting Tombs’ post, the Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) acknowledges the value of the NIST rankings, but also their limits. “Given the test data is not the same quality as is used in real-world implementations, as Robin Tombs points out below, the absolute values for margins of error are somewhat misleading. Typically, in practice results are even more accurate.” 

“This is further evidence that estimation has a role to play alongside verification.”

Other familiar names hovering near the top of the NIST charts, which were last updated in February 2025, include Ondato, Incode, Nominder and ROC

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Grocery Outlet stores deploy SAFR facial recognition to ID suspected shoplifters

Facial recognition systems are scanning shoppers as they enter a growing number of Grocery Outlet stores in the San Francisco…

 

Federal audit finds major gaps in US aviation cybersecurity oversight

The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has not fully carried out its strategy for protecting air traffic systems and other…

 

Within line of sight – personal issue police drones are on the horizon

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner The announcement by the Metropolitan Police Service that they are…

 

GoSerpent campaign used coordinated malware chain to steal government files

A previously undocumented malware campaign targeting government and diplomatic organizations in Southeast Asia used a succession of remote access, credential…

 

Biometric age assurance market gears up for rapid expansion as rules clarify

Biometric age assurance was turned up to 11 this week, as in 11 different Biometric Update articles on efforts to…

 

Age assurance explained: The laws reshaping the internet

A year ago, age assurance was a niche topic and the biometrics industry was still anticipating the effect that the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events