FB pixel

ACCS announces certification capability for Canada’s age verification standard

ACCS announces certification capability for Canada’s age verification standard
 

The UK-based Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS) has announced it can now certify age verification and estimation technologies against Canada’s national standard for age assurance.

Canada’s national standards body DGSI approved the CAN/DGSI 127:2025 standard in August, and published it just days ago. Adding Canada’s standard to its certification services portfolio gives the ACCS “a complete global certification pathway across the UK, EU, Canada, and beyond,” the organization says.

The ACCS released the comprehensive final report from Australia’s Age Assurance Technology Trial on Sunday.

The 18-page document on Canada’s standard specifies seven different methods of performing age checks: self-declaration; document-based age verification; “biometric and characteristic based verification;” capacity testing; federation from other accounts or platforms; profiling, which is an inference (or “prediction”) based on behavior analysis; and authorized confirmation, such as by a parent or recognized professional.

ACCS Digital Marketing Assistant Lily Edwards notes in a LinkedIn post that the national standard aligns with ISO/IEC 27566 and IEEE 2089.1, with tailoring for Canadian law and privacy frameworks. It also specifically references the Pan-Canadian Trust Framework (PCTF) as a normative reference.

The standard stipulates that relying parties must perform comprehensive privacy impact assessments when deploying age assurance technologies, including a Child Rights Impact Assessment (CRIA) as defined by UNICEF. They are also required to consider the accuracy of the technology they use, the appropriate level of confidence, and to offer users multiple options.

Acceptable age assurance technologies must align with Privacy by Design and Privacy by Default, proportionality and data minimization principles. If they use AI, the relying party must tell the user. The standard also sets requirements for minimizing data storage and ensuring it is secure if required.

The standard will be subject to a technical committee review within two years.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events