FB pixel

Biometrics Commissioner criticizes UK police, home office governance rules in annual report

 

UK Biometrics Commissioner Paul Wiles has published the office’s annual report for 2017, expressing concern about a lack of adequate governance practices in several areas of biometric data collection and retention among police and government agencies.

The 125-page report includes a range of pointed criticisms, and points out that legislation is urgently needed to extend the Protections of Freedom Act (PoFA) beyond fingerprints and DNA to cover other modalities.

The report notes that while fingerprint and DNA biometrics are widely used and accepted, and evidence from them is rarely challenged in court, the same is not true of “second generation biometrics” or some new technologies for fingerprint and DNA identification. It identifies efforts undertaken so far towards establishing consensus within the scientific community about how evidence from other biometrics should be presented, and to produce primers to help the judiciary understand evidence given in the form of these biometrics.

Gaps in legal and procedural foundations for biometric programs are already having a negative impact, however.

“Lack of governance is leaving a worrying vacuum which the police tell me is making their experiments with new biometrics more difficult and uncertain and so risks undermining public confidence in policing,” Wiles writes.

“Furthermore, lack of clarity about future governance arrangements for new biometrics may actually impede growth, since it is less costly to develop operational systems within a known governance structure than to have to adapt existing systems to take account of governance rules developed later.”

The commissioner also pointed out the importance of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of different biometrics as more programs are initiated.

The expansion and sharing of biometric databases, as well as the retention and deletion of the data they contain are also considered in the report. The commissioner criticized the lack of a governance structure for the IDENT1 police fingerprint database comparable to the one used for the national DNA database, and urged the establishment of a legal basis and governance arrangements for inter-departmental searches.

In a section on “Future Biometric Challenges,” Wiles says the new Home Office Biometrics platforms due to begin limited operation in 2020 have “no governance rules about access and use to the different databases,” and urged the Home Office to create a clear governance structure and rules for data sharing.

Delays in the Home Office biometrics strategy, which is due this month, as well as in the deletion of facial images in accordance with a court order were recently criticized by the parliamentary Science and Technology Committee.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Competing DPI models take diverse paths to common goals

Different models of digital public infrastructure are emerging as the concept takes hold in official government policies and technology deployments….

 

Global leaders seek govt push for public trust in digital ID systems

As governments in various regions push towards the adoption of digital ID systems, they face the crucial challenge of earning…

 

Biometrics contracts span immigration, law enforcement and travel tools

New contracts for biometrics with immigration, law enforcement and airport authorities are generating millions of dollars for a handful of…

 

Oxford program to study DPI impact on social, financial inclusion

Oxford University’s Blavatnik School of Government has announced the establishment of the Oxford Digital Public Infrastructure Research Lab (OxDPI), an…

 

Idemia makes OEM pitch for biometric modules

A recent webinar from Idemia Public Security looks at how original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) can integrate seamless security into devices…

 

ICE wants biometric monitoring devices for alternative to detention program

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a Request for Information (RFI) for biometric monitoring devices as part of its…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events