FB pixel

The possibilities of biometric surveillance grow with unsettling questions, critics allege

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News  |  Surveillance
The possibilities of biometric surveillance grow with unsettling questions, critics allege
 

Three recent articles, two journalistic and one research, have looked at questionable biometric surveillance tools and found reason to worry about how their use can be reconciled with a reasonable person’s expectation of privacy. Emotion recognition and demographic classification are identified as particularly threatening.

One of the three pieces, in fact, harshly judges the first significant stab at comprehensive regulation of AI in high-risk applications.

That article, published by AI research house the Ada Lovelace Institute, points to the progress of government control efforts of face biometrics as an indicator for how AI as a whole might be reined.

Draft EU legislation made public in late April suffers from “an outdated distinction between identification and classification” and depends too much on industry self-regulation and certification, according to the institute.

Indiscriminate identification and categorization are treated as separate activities, though both violate privacy and can harm individuals when they mischaracterize them.

For instance, institute researchers say that the draft would allow algorithms to categorize people remotely and in real time as a particular ethnicity or sexual orientation based on their appearance alone.

Likewise, they found that even as framers of the document tried to think of near-future technological change and use, they “fail[ed] to adequately grapple with the risks of emotion recognition.”

The article warns (as others have) of the danger of trusting machine vision code to discern a person’s mood. Some have likened the effort to phrenology on a scale that 19th century probers of head bumps could never have imagined.

A new piece in the Atlantic about the controversial case for emotion recognition found another analogy.

In 1967, a U.S. psychologist traveled to a remote tribe in Papua New Guinea to see if he could prove that humans have a few universal emotions. The article recounts the frustration everyone in the experiment experienced.

The psychologist was ill-prepared to work productively with the tribe, and the reaction of extremely isolated people with the effort is anyone’s guess.

In other words, it is easy to underestimate the complexity of something as simple as a smile. That is not dissuading billions of dollars from being invested in emotion recognition systems — offshoots of facial recognition software.

The technology is “based on questionable methodologies” that pose a threat because they already are being deployed.

As noted in the article, job applicants today are being rejected for positions because “their facial expressions or vocal tones don’t match those of other employees.” Without real skepticismon the part of business owners and public officials, perceived emotions could become one more piece of digital evidence that can forever alter lives.

The third piece, in The Conversation, adopts a similar tone regarding voice recognition. Its author proposes banning virtually all uses of voice biometrics outside of identity authentication.

In particular, voice profiling should never be used in marketing interactions with individuals, in political campaigns and for government tasks without warrants.

That might be an overreaction, but, as the article explains, some scientists say they can use algorithms to describe a person’s health, gender, race, weight and height.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Municipal ID programs offer ID to undocumented people, and ICE wants their data

Amid the ongoing collapse of democratic norms in the U.S., it is easy to miss a nightmare scenario unfolding for…

 

Unissey levels-up biometric injection attack detection certification

Unissey’s face biometrics have been certified to substantial-level compliance with the European biometric injection attack detection (IAD) standard. Injection attacks…

 

Hey babe, check out my regulations: porn star, VerifyMy spice up UK Online Safety Act

It’s one thing when Christian moralists lobby for age assurance laws – but another thing entirely when the voices are…

 

Regula launches dedicated biometric morph attack detector

A new face morphing detector has been unveiled by Regula to defend against the significant security threat of passports and…

 

UK regulator fines 23andMe over massive genetic data breach

The U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has fined U.S.-based 23andMe £2.31 million for serious security failures that resulted in a…

 

Tonga reveals MOSIP and VS One World foundations of DPI success

Tonga launched its TongaPass digital ID and digital government portal this month. The government is now ramping up registration as…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events