FB pixel

Cops in 5 nations see a way to use facial recognition safely and effectively

WEF, UN framework updated
Cops in 5 nations see a way to use facial recognition safely and effectively
 

Privacy advocates willing to consider giving police facial recognition tools have said they would support it only if certain policies were in place. Policies like keeping algorithms under close human oversight.

It seems that a similar consensus formed among six law enforcement agencies around the world participating in a pilot deployment project.

Global development nonprofit the World Economic Forum, along with INTERPOL and the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI), published the first draft of a framework for fair and effective use of face biometrics in policing last year. Then they recruited the agencies to use facial recognition algorithms using those guides.

This month, the forum published an update to the frame work including the field work. (There are similar reports.)

Two of the six agencies are in France: the National Gendarmerie and the Central Directorate of the Judicial Police. The others were the Brazilian Federal Police, Netherlands Police, New Zealand Police and Swedish Police Authority.

The group felt it “essential” that officers operating the software as well as policymakers understand how it works and how it does not work. Members also recommended that all results from face recognition searchers be viewed by someone who is trained specifically for the task.

And regardless of that review, the information should be treated as an investigatory lead for detectives, not as probable cause for arrest.

And if the feedback from the agencies is any gauge, facial recognition algorithms would, indeed, be used. The update report says criminals change their tactics and strategies rapidly and crime-fighting funding can be hard to secure.

“Many in the law enforcement community feel that (facial recognition) is not only an option, but a necessity,” according to the report.

Then, as if picking up the recommendation of algorithm skeptics, the report says more attention needs to be focused how to make use of the systems transparent and to communicate with communities.

And it tackles the gorilla in the room: real-time facial recognition.

The report indicates that this “presents unique challenges.” More guidance on how it is used, if it is used, is needed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Meta uses AI profiling to infer user age, enforce teen restrictions

Meta says it has begun using AI to detect and remove users under 13 from its platforms, and to automatically…

 

Market for agentic commerce keeps growing, outpacing rails

According to Grandview Research, the global agentic commerce market size was worth $5.71 billion in 2025 and is projected to…

 

DRC seeks consultant for ambitious digital transformation, DPI project

The Democratic Republic of Congo is seeking a consultant as it launches a massive Digital Transformation Project. The wide-ranging project…

 

South Africa gazettes digital ID draft regulation, seeks comments

South Africans have up to June 6 to submit comments on draft amendments to the country’s Identification Act of 1997…

 

FTC settlement targets sale of mobile location data linked to sensitive sites

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has moved to prohibit Sandpoint, Idaho-based data broker Kochava and its subsidiary, Cedar Rapids, Iowa-based…

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events