FB pixel

Cops in 5 nations see a way to use facial recognition safely and effectively

WEF, UN framework updated
Cops in 5 nations see a way to use facial recognition safely and effectively
 

Privacy advocates willing to consider giving police facial recognition tools have said they would support it only if certain policies were in place. Policies like keeping algorithms under close human oversight.

It seems that a similar consensus formed among six law enforcement agencies around the world participating in a pilot deployment project.

Global development nonprofit the World Economic Forum, along with INTERPOL and the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI), published the first draft of a framework for fair and effective use of face biometrics in policing last year. Then they recruited the agencies to use facial recognition algorithms using those guides.

This month, the forum published an update to the frame work including the field work. (There are similar reports.)

Two of the six agencies are in France: the National Gendarmerie and the Central Directorate of the Judicial Police. The others were the Brazilian Federal Police, Netherlands Police, New Zealand Police and Swedish Police Authority.

The group felt it “essential” that officers operating the software as well as policymakers understand how it works and how it does not work. Members also recommended that all results from face recognition searchers be viewed by someone who is trained specifically for the task.

And regardless of that review, the information should be treated as an investigatory lead for detectives, not as probable cause for arrest.

And if the feedback from the agencies is any gauge, facial recognition algorithms would, indeed, be used. The update report says criminals change their tactics and strategies rapidly and crime-fighting funding can be hard to secure.

“Many in the law enforcement community feel that (facial recognition) is not only an option, but a necessity,” according to the report.

Then, as if picking up the recommendation of algorithm skeptics, the report says more attention needs to be focused how to make use of the systems transparent and to communicate with communities.

And it tackles the gorilla in the room: real-time facial recognition.

The report indicates that this “presents unique challenges.” More guidance on how it is used, if it is used, is needed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

RIVR results show biometric liveness detection effectiveness highly variable

The state of the art in biometric presentation attack detection (PAD) is better than document validation, but far worse than…

 

Court signals NetChoice faces tougher road on age check laws

The legal campaign against state social media age check laws is entering a more precarious phase for NetChoice and the…

 

Spain’s AEPD fines Yoti $1.1M for biometric data handling violations

Yoti has been fined 950,000 euros (roughly US$1.1 million) by Spanish data protection regulator AEPD for the handling of biometrics…

 

UK gov’t to design and build national digital ID in-house

The UK government plans to design, build and run its digital ID in-house, rather than outsourcing it to a private-sector…

 

UK Lords reject bid to block police facial recognition searches of DVLA database

The UK’s House of Lords has voted down an attempt to prevent the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) database…

 

India is leading example of digital infrastructure, IMF says

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is being recognized as a foundational public good and a new paper from the International Monetary…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events