FB pixel

Proposed AI Act amendments would add biometric data to ‘high-risk’ criteria

Proposed AI Act amendments would add biometric data to ‘high-risk’ criteria
 

A tenth set of amendments to the EU AI Act have been proposed by the co-rapporteurs of the European Parliament, Euractiv reports, which focusses on the criteria for classifying AI systems as “high-risk.”

“High-risk” systems as currently defined include public facial recognition and some other biometric systems, and are subject to the most rigorous rules for deployment of any allowable deployment type.

High-risk classification occurs when an AI system is covered by the safety rules of the EU harmonization legislation, as toys and machinery are, or if the use cases is listed under Annex III.

The amendments recommended by MEPs Brando Benifei and Dragoș Tudorache added the requirement for “high-risk” classification that the system must have a specific purpose, which would exclude general-purpose AI.

Deployment for the purposes listed in Annex III also would require a second test to meet the “high-risk” threshold. Systems receiving personal or biometric information as input or affecting people’s health, safety or fundamental rights can be counted as high-risk.

The amendments also give the European Commission the power to amend the specific use cases in Annex III. The original text grants this power only to the EU executive.

They also add system functionalities that go beyond the intended purpose potential for misuse, the nature and volume of data being processed as conditions for assessing new risks. Other conditions for assessing risks included are the level of system autonomy, discrimination risk, availability of mitigating measures, potential benefits and the effectiveness of human oversight.

The Commission would consult with the AI Office, and the office and national authorities can challenge the Commission’s decisions. The EU executive would then reassess the decision and publish its rationale.

EU Member States recently arrived at a common position on the AI Act, but the draft legislation continues to draw criticism.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Governments grappling with biometrics to ease airport, public service access

Many of the biometrics providers convening in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire for ID4Africa’s 2026 AGM got a first-hand look at how…

 

Biometric Update Podcast: Claire Ma explores the next phase of government digital identity

Governments around the world are moving toward digital identity systems, but not all are taking the same path. On the…

 

Trusted Caller ID with digital wallet and VCs improves call center authentication

Decentralized digital IDs shared from a digital wallet on a smartphone can significantly speed up identity verification by call centers,…

 

EES records 66M border crossings in first six months despite rollout friction

During its first six months of operation of Europe’s biometric-based Entry-Exit System (EES), daily fingerprint checks against EU databases rose…

 

IDDEEA outlines role of e-signatures in Bosnia’s digital transformation

Qualified electronic signatures (QES) have the potential to bring significant improvements to complex, fragmented public administrations like those in Bosnia…

 

Luxembourg opens tender for AI-generated content detection tool

Luxembourg’s Ministry of Digitalization has opened a call for solutions to develop a deepfake detection platform intended to support the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events