FB pixel

Passkeys can make online payment authentication easier, but it’s complicated

Passkeys can make online payment authentication easier, but it’s complicated
 

If passkeys are adopted for online payments, the technology’s user base could scale rapidly. But payments are complicated, leading the FIDO Alliance to ask a panel at Authenticate 2024; “can we use passkeys to authenticate users in online card transactions”?

Payments were one of the use cases for passkeys that the conference focused on, with a dedicated track on Wednesday afternoon.

The discussion between Jonathan Grossar of Mastercard, Henna Kapur of Visa and Sean Estrada of Stripe was moderated by FIDO Alliance CEO and ED Andrew Shikiar.

The standards and infrastructure, or “rails” that underlie payment technology predate digital transactions, Estrada pointed out at the beginning of the discussion.

Authentication for payments is different than for account access, Shikiar says, and Grossar explained that the difference in risk introduced by the prospect of financial loss sets the bar higher. That means using passkeys as one of several authentication factors, along with device and card ownership.

Passkeys fit with the Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) requirement of Europe’s PSD2, but only in combination with another factor. If the passkey is based on biometrics, a knowledge or possession factor is needed.

PSD3 is coming, too. Kapur suggests that the new regulation may make the use of passkeys in online payments easier. In India, where Mastercard has introduced passkeys, regulations are different. In Southeast Asia and Africa are more different regulations, and many payments are made with QR codes.

Passkeys could also fit into automative payments in the future, with Kapur explained, with the car’s digital system as an acceptance channel and authentication through voice biometrics. The standards and technologies are still being worked out, however.

Ultimately, Grossar says, if passkeys are going to meet the needs of the global payment industry, the standards need to further evolve.

In the meantime, the answer to the question posed to the panel is “yes.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Digital sovereignty, infrastructure and credential formats colliding

Digital credential formats are on the verge of being sucked into a global debate over the nature of sovereignty with…

 

Digital ID for alcohol sales is coming to the UK: hear what it means for the identity sector

For about two years now, leaders in the UK have been promising that, soon, people will be able to use…

 

Ant International, Visa, Mastercard work to make agentic protocols interoperable 

Ant International, Mastercard and Visa are collaborating on a Know-Your-Agent (KYA) interoperability framework, which a release says is “designed to…

 

Unico acquires biometrics provider Valida, gaining entry into Argentina market

Unico has announced it signed a definitive agreement to acquire Valida, “an Argentine biometric identity verification platform with an established…

 

KPMG investment in Reality Defender backs hiring spree to fight deepfakes

U.S.-based KPMG LLP has taken a minority stake in deepfake detection developer Reality Defender and plans to integrate its fraud-protecting…

 

Australia expands eSafety powers, doubles penalties in platform accountability push

Australia’s parliament has formally passed the Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026, granting…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events