FB pixel

Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume

Fraunhofer IGD remains atop QAA 1% removal category
Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume
 

Biometric image quality analysis algorithms are getting better at predicting when facial recognition will fail, according to evaluations by America’s technology testing authority, but gradually. Some of the best on the market were submitted for evaluation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology several years ago

Assessments of algorithms for face and iris biometrics matching and sample quality analysis by NIST resumed operation earlier in September after a hiatus of just over a month. The FATE Quality Specific Image Defect Detection (SIDD) evaluation assesses the effectiveness of facial image quality assessment algorithms (QAAs). It was put on hiatus from early August to September 8, along with the FRTE and IREX evaluations, to update NIST’s computing infrastructure and biometric datasets.

With the entry-to-visa dataset, Daon scored the lowest in both false non-match rate (FNMR) and efficiency among entry images after the removal of the five percent with the lowest quality scores.

Other submissions to FATE Quality this year are from Guangzhou, China-based Pixel Solutions, listed as “Pixelall” (with submissions in March and July), Mobbeel Solutions and Innovatrics.

Pixel Solutions had the lowest FNMR and the highest efficiency with the kiosk-to-entry dataset.

An algorithm submitted by Fraunhofer IGD in December had the best results by FNMR and efficiency with the entry-to-visa dataset with the bottom 1 percent of images by quality removed.

Notably, algorithms submitted in 2022 by Intema and Idemia, and in 2023 by secunet remain amongst the top five in multiple categories, underlining the uneven extent of recent gains.

“Quality assessment is critical to delivering reliable biometric capabilities,” says Michael Peirce, chief scientist at Daon. “Our algorithms identify subtle quality indicators that directly translate to better outcomes for our customers’ identity processes. By filtering out problematic images upfront, organizations achieve higher accuracy rates while reducing false rejections that frustrate legitimate users.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ring and Flock call off integration as scrutiny of camera-to-police partnership intensifies

Amazon-owned Ring and Flock Safety have canceled their planned partnership, stepping back from an integration that would have linked one…

 

MOSIP pursues democratization of digital identity with unconference conversations

A democratic vision of digital identity is central to the non-profit, open-source mandate of MOSIP. As the organization and the…

 

Liveness is king: FaceTec’s Jay Meier in conversation with Chris Burt 

It’s best, says Jay Meier, to think about identity management as a system of symbiotic systems. Which is to say,…

 

Ofcom fines Kick, threatens 4chan as OSA enforcement steadily dials up

UK regulator Ofcom has faced criticism for being too slow and lenient with its power to enforce the Online Safety…

 

Innovatrics, ROC improve rankings in NIST ELFT, rising to 2 and 3 respectively

Innovatrics is celebrating success in the latest National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint Technologies (ELFT)…

 

Meta plans launch of facial recognition to smart glasses in ‘dynamic political environment’

Meta is reportedly planning to roll out facial recognition capabilities for its smart glasses as early as this year, taking…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events