FB pixel

Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume

Fraunhofer IGD remains atop QAA 1% removal category
Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume
 

Biometric image quality analysis algorithms are getting better at predicting when facial recognition will fail, according to evaluations by America’s technology testing authority, but gradually. Some of the best on the market were submitted for evaluation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology several years ago

Assessments of algorithms for face and iris biometrics matching and sample quality analysis by NIST resumed operation earlier in September after a hiatus of just over a month. The FATE Quality Specific Image Defect Detection (SIDD) evaluation assesses the effectiveness of facial image quality assessment algorithms (QAAs). It was put on hiatus from early August to September 8, along with the FRTE and IREX evaluations, to update NIST’s computing infrastructure and biometric datasets.

With the entry-to-visa dataset, Daon scored the lowest in both false non-match rate (FNMR) and efficiency among entry images after the removal of the five percent with the lowest quality scores.

Other submissions to FATE Quality this year are from Guangzhou, China-based Pixel Solutions, listed as “Pixelall” (with submissions in March and July), Mobbeel Solutions and Innovatrics.

Pixel Solutions had the lowest FNMR and the highest efficiency with the kiosk-to-entry dataset.

An algorithm submitted by Fraunhofer IGD in December had the best results by FNMR and efficiency with the entry-to-visa dataset with the bottom 1 percent of images by quality removed.

Notably, algorithms submitted in 2022 by Intema and Idemia, and in 2023 by secunet remain amongst the top five in multiple categories, underlining the uneven extent of recent gains.

“Quality assessment is critical to delivering reliable biometric capabilities,” says Michael Peirce, chief scientist at Daon. “Our algorithms identify subtle quality indicators that directly translate to better outcomes for our customers’ identity processes. By filtering out problematic images upfront, organizations achieve higher accuracy rates while reducing false rejections that frustrate legitimate users.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events