FB pixel

Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume

Fraunhofer IGD remains atop QAA 1% removal category
Daon, Pixel in image quality pole positions as paused NIST biometric tests resume
 

Biometric image quality analysis algorithms are getting better at predicting when facial recognition will fail, according to evaluations by America’s technology testing authority, but gradually. Some of the best on the market were submitted for evaluation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology several years ago

Assessments of algorithms for face and iris biometrics matching and sample quality analysis by NIST resumed operation earlier in September after a hiatus of just over a month. The FATE Quality Specific Image Defect Detection (SIDD) evaluation assesses the effectiveness of facial image quality assessment algorithms (QAAs). It was put on hiatus from early August to September 8, along with the FRTE and IREX evaluations, to update NIST’s computing infrastructure and biometric datasets.

With the entry-to-visa dataset, Daon scored the lowest in both false non-match rate (FNMR) and efficiency among entry images after the removal of the five percent with the lowest quality scores.

Other submissions to FATE Quality this year are from Guangzhou, China-based Pixel Solutions, listed as “Pixelall” (with submissions in March and July), Mobbeel Solutions and Innovatrics.

Pixel Solutions had the lowest FNMR and the highest efficiency with the kiosk-to-entry dataset.

An algorithm submitted by Fraunhofer IGD in December had the best results by FNMR and efficiency with the entry-to-visa dataset with the bottom 1 percent of images by quality removed.

Notably, algorithms submitted in 2022 by Intema and Idemia, and in 2023 by secunet remain amongst the top five in multiple categories, underlining the uneven extent of recent gains.

“Quality assessment is critical to delivering reliable biometric capabilities,” says Michael Peirce, chief scientist at Daon. “Our algorithms identify subtle quality indicators that directly translate to better outcomes for our customers’ identity processes. By filtering out problematic images upfront, organizations achieve higher accuracy rates while reducing false rejections that frustrate legitimate users.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics handling new frontiers and changed expectations, from agents to gait

Successes in airport biometrics are driving deployments and expansions all over the world. But the technology cannot perform miracles like…

 

Financial institutions stumbling into phishing-resistant MFA gaps, report warns

Financial institutions seem aware that phishing is worsening, but that awareness has not translated into stronger authentication across the workforce….

 

Proof, Enigma link KYB to authorized people, AI agents with biometrics

Proof and Enigma have launched Business Certificates, a cryptographic credential that connects a verified business identity to the people and…

 

Investors back Lissi, Gataca’s expansions to meet EU Digital Identity Wallet moment

A pair of European digital wallet developers have new resources to pursue market share in the nascent continental ecosystem for…

 

New Incode age estimation tool processes biometrics on-device

Prompted by the introduction of online safety regulations globally, Incode has released an on-device age estimation product. An announcement from…

 

Western Australia privacy commissioner not consulted on police facial recognition trial

The Office of the Information Commissioner of Western Australia (OIC WA) says it was not invited to participate in any…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events