FB pixel

Reddit users’ questions expose major shortcoming in age assurance effort

The tech is viable, the laws are set – but few seem to know exactly what’s happening
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Reddit users’ questions expose major shortcoming in age assurance effort
 

 “Am I the only one that’s confused about how they’re going to confirm if you’re a certain age?” So asks a Reddit user, in response to the company’s notice regarding the age assurance requirements that come into effect for Australian users today, under the country’s online safety codes and attendant “social media ban for under-16s.”

Apparently the answer to the above question is, no – a worrying sign for the short-term success of Australia’s groundbreaking law.

Reddit says it’s just trying to play by the rules: “While we disagree with the government’s assessment of Reddit as being within the scope of the law, we need to take steps to comply.” In its list of changes, it specifies that “we care deeply about the safety of our users, including any minors, and while some of these changes are required by law, others represent global measures we’re voluntarily taking to improve safety and privacy for those under 18.”

Persona, the biometrics firm that handles age assurance for Reddit, also has an explainer on how age verification for Reddit works in Australia. One important note says that “Persona deletes all of your personal information including any images within 3 days. After 3 days your data will be automatically deleted.” It also says it only ever uses the data to provide proof of age, and won’t feed it into any AI databases for training.

Reddit announced its partnership with Persona in July 2025, months ahead of the December 10 deadline for social media platforms in Australia.

Nonetheless, many of the top comments on its post about age verification express some variant of perplexity at what, exactly, is happening, and how it will work.

“Most are confused on how it’s going to be implemented and it comes out tomorrow,” says one.

“That’s because there’s been f*%# all details released for the public to prepare,” says a reply.

The thread is a revealing glimpse into the gap between the Australian government’s legislative efforts to push through the law, and the message that is reaching the public. Much of the criticism of age assurance has alleged privacy risks or accuracy; not enough has focused on how the government and its collaborators package the technology, and how it is served to the public in general.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Access earned: how your credential keeps up with your career

The office as an access matrix A modern office environment is not a single space. It’s a layered matrix of…

 

ROC looks beyond biometrics with unified Vision AI strategy

ROC is trying to move beyond the biometric technology that made its name, putting identity, video analytics and digital evidence…

 

NIST launches resource hub to support SP 800-63-4 implementation

NIST has launched an online hub of implementation resources for the latest revision of its Digital Identity Guidelines, adding FAQs,…

 

Biometrics industry urges Congress to expand border screening, set limits on traveler profiling

The International Biometrics and Identity Association (IBIA) is urging Congress to expand biometric screening at U.S. land borders, fund comprehensive…

 

ROC expands into developer market with debut of facial age estimation SaaS

Colorado-based ROC has taken the first step toward establishing a new revenue base by delivering its Vision AI platform to…

 

Clear brings optional selfie sign-ins to VA.gov

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has launched a pilot of Clear’s biometric identity platform, giving veterans another way…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events