FB pixel

DHS RIVR results suggest most ID document validation disastrously ineffective

DHS RIVR results suggest most ID document validation disastrously ineffective
 

The results of the identity document validation track within the 2025 Remote Identity Validation Rally are sobering. They indicate that of the seven anonymized identity document validation subsystems tested at the Maryland Test Facility (MdTF) for DHS’ Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), several are highly ineffective, and none are robust.

A single vendor’s ID document validation technology met the target set for security, as measured by false acceptance rate, and another met the goal for useability, as expressed by false rejection rate.

ID documents from Maryland and California, and fraudulent documents supplied through a collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland and Security Investigations (DHS HSI) lab.

S&T set “thresholds” at which to consider the system effective, and a more stringent “goal” for each metric.

Four of the seven subsystems tested met the goal for system error rate. Four did not meet the threshold for FRR, and five fell short in FAR. In other words, most systems let too few legitimate IDs through, even more passed too many fraudulent IDs, and six of seven fell short on one or both sides of the assessment.

DVS 6 returned results which met the threshold for FRR, and the evaluation’s goal for SER and FAR, making it the unequivocal best performer of those tested.

Only one other DVS, number 3, met the threshold set for FAR, at just below 5.7 percent, and DVS 5, the only subsystem with an FRR below 1 percent (at 0.6 percent), had an FAR of 13.8 percent. But DVS 3 was also the only system that failed to meet the threshold for SER.

DVS 4 posted an FRR above 97 percent, suggesting that at least it should block many fraud attempts, but it also posted an FAR above 10 percent.

The selfie match portion of RIVR was far more encouraging, with five of 16 submitted systems meeting the biometric matching effectiveness goals, and 10 meeting the thresholds.

The previous running of RIVR, back when it was known as RIVTD, included 12 participants in the document validation track. Detailed results were not released, but S&T said they “gave companies clear targets for improvement.”

An IJCB 2025 competition on presentation attack detection (PAD) for ID cards found document spoofs remain challenging. Incode won the track related to generalized spoof protection.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

US Treasury’s crypto playbook puts digital identity at the center

The U.S. Department of Treasury’s just released report to Congress on innovative technologies to counter illicit finance involving digital assets…

 

India is leading example of digital infrastructure, IMF says

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is being recognized as a foundational public good and a new paper from the International Monetary…

 

UK startup raises $15M to build Europe’s sovereign alternative to biometric surveillance

A British start-up has raised millions for its biometric-alternative surveillance technology. Augur, a resilience technology startup, has raised $15 million…

 

NIST concept paper explores identity and authorization controls for AI agents

A draft concept paper released by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) asks industry and government stakeholders how…

 

Age assurance community sets new goals with standard published and use exploding

“Age Assurance Has Come of Age,” crows the Draft Summit Communiqué for the upcoming Global Age Assurance Standards Summit 2026….

 

‘Big Tech’ fears and confusion dominate dialogue over UK digital ID scheme

The UK government’s digital ID consultation has begun, its detailed plan for the process finally revealed, but all that is…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events