FB pixel

AI Act could inform biometrics standards for European identity regulation

Research paper explores potential influence and enforcement
AI Act could inform biometrics standards for European identity regulation
 

The European Union’s AI Act may not achieve the “Brussels effect” – incentivizing non-EU countries to accept changes in AI products and regulations. The legislation could, however, influence future standards and safeguards for biometric and identification tools within the bloc itself, including for initiatives such as the EU Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet.

This means that the question of whether the AI Act protects fundamental rights is even more important, according to a new research paper analyzing the legislation’s internal influence within the EU.

“The AI Act is expected to establish a protective standard for biometrics and identification tools, reflecting the EU’s commitment to proportionally balancing innovation with regulation, exemplified in the Digital Identity Wallet,” the paper notes. “However, the EU appears to overlook the risks related to enforcing the rule.”

The paper titled From Global Standards to Local Safeguards: The AI Act, Biometrics, and Fundamental Rights also looks into how AI Act principles should guide other projects using biometric data and analyzes the European standards for regulating biometric identification systems. Authored by Federica Paolucci, Ph.D. Candidate at the Bocconi University, in Milan the paper is forthcoming in Springer by the end of 2024.

Although the AI rulebook seeks to establish a product safety standard, it leaves balancing security and rights protections to EU member states, according to the researcher.  This is why it is important to monitor how individual states will enact the legislation.

One particular issue is the use of real-time and retrospective facial recognition. Although the AI Act bans biometric surveillance in public spaces, it leaves exceptions for law enforcement in specific circumstances.

“While acknowledging the AI Act’s achievements, such as the inclusion of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment framework and procedural rights exercise, concerns persist regarding inconsistencies in biometric surveillance and potential inefficiencies in fundamental rights protection mechanisms,” the paper notes.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

AI fraud crackdown risks locking blind users out of biometric identity systems

Government identity verification systems are increasingly locking blind and low-vision (BLV) Americans out of essential services as agencies deploy stricter…

 

Police use of AI ‘outrageous and unforgivable privacy invasion’ – say the police

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner Condemnation of police forces deploying ‘opaque and untested’ surveillance tools…

 

Senators press DHS to abandon biometric smart glasses plan for immigration officers

A group of Democratic senators led by Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Jeff Merkley of Oregon is demanding that the…

 

Europe needs decentralized digital identity infrastructure, policy paper argues

Over the past years, European nations have made significant progress in digital identity: The EU has established eIDAS 2.0, Switzerland…

 

Vietnam targets 2035 for fully digital citizen–government interactions

Vietnam is going full tilt with digital transformation as the government approves a plan to make all transactions between citizens…

 

Election deepfake laws spread across US ahead of 2026 midterms

Maryland has become the 30th U.S. state to enact election deepfake legislation, as lawmakers race to address AI-generated political deception…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events