FB pixel

Siri users consent before enrolling voice biometrics, Apple argues seeking BIPA suit dismissal

Siri users consent before enrolling voice biometrics, Apple argues seeking BIPA suit dismissal
 

Apple has asked a circuit court judge to dismiss a potential class action lawsuit filed against it under the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) of Illinois, on grounds that its virtual assistant Siri captures and stores biometric “voiceprints” of users only with their voluntary and intentional participation in an optional process, the Cook County Record reports.

The suit alleges that Apple violates BIPA’s informed consent requirements as part of the speaker-identification process for its voice-activated digital assistant, and Apple does not dispute what is happening during the enrollment process. It does, however, dispute that the process skips consent, saying it requires “knowing, voluntary and intentional interaction” and express consent to the enrollment protocol of a feature that is optional.

“The user controls the whole process, and Apple does not have access to this user profile,” Apple claims. “Instead, the user profile remains on the user’s device and simply allows Siri to recognize the ‘Hey Siri’ command.”

In this sense, the data does not constitute a unique biometric identifier protected by BIPA rules, the company argues.

The complaint by Deborah Zaluda also does not make specific allegations of disclosures or dissemination violating BIPA, the company said, acknowledging media reports that contractors are given access to recordings to evaluate the performance of voice recognition software. Informed written consent is also part of the profile creation process, according to Apple.

“Users consent before providing the utterances that are used to create the user profile,” the iPhone maker argues. “Thus, with respect to the user profile, users have the ‘power to say no’ intended by BIPA.”

The motion also notes that handwritten signatures and physical documents are not required by BIPA, and says that the complaint recognizes the consent process for its fingerprint and facial recognition technology without explaining why the process for its voice biometrics fail to meet the threshold.

Facebook settled a BIPA class action for a record-high $550 million last week, but its defense strategy was based on whether the plaintiff had legal standing, not a claim that the statutory requirements were in fact met.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Private sector age verification providers aren’t dying – but they do have to change

To date, government age assurance solutions have prompted lively discussion about whether or not they pose a threat to age…

 

ICE contract secures nationwide access to private iris biometric database

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is moving to give its Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) agents nationwide access to…

 

From identity to intent: Reimagining biometrics for real-time fraud prevention

By Lenny Gusel, Head of Fraud Solutions (North America), Feedzai As instant payments and open banking accelerate transaction speed and…

 

Global ID, Idiap partner to scale finger vein biometrics with machine learning

Swiss startup Global ID has announced that it has launched a new project with the Idiap Research Institute that aims…

 

Armenia passes biometric ID law as it moves toward EU visa liberalization

Armenia has passed a package of laws on identity documents, paving the way for the introduction of a new biometric…

 

Luxembourg launches new 10-year biometric passport

Luxembourg officially introduced its new biometric passport on Monday, equipped with stronger security features and an extended validity period of…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events