FB pixel

Siri users consent before enrolling voice biometrics, Apple argues seeking BIPA suit dismissal

Siri users consent before enrolling voice biometrics, Apple argues seeking BIPA suit dismissal
 

Apple has asked a circuit court judge to dismiss a potential class action lawsuit filed against it under the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) of Illinois, on grounds that its virtual assistant Siri captures and stores biometric “voiceprints” of users only with their voluntary and intentional participation in an optional process, the Cook County Record reports.

The suit alleges that Apple violates BIPA’s informed consent requirements as part of the speaker-identification process for its voice-activated digital assistant, and Apple does not dispute what is happening during the enrollment process. It does, however, dispute that the process skips consent, saying it requires “knowing, voluntary and intentional interaction” and express consent to the enrollment protocol of a feature that is optional.

“The user controls the whole process, and Apple does not have access to this user profile,” Apple claims. “Instead, the user profile remains on the user’s device and simply allows Siri to recognize the ‘Hey Siri’ command.”

In this sense, the data does not constitute a unique biometric identifier protected by BIPA rules, the company argues.

The complaint by Deborah Zaluda also does not make specific allegations of disclosures or dissemination violating BIPA, the company said, acknowledging media reports that contractors are given access to recordings to evaluate the performance of voice recognition software. Informed written consent is also part of the profile creation process, according to Apple.

“Users consent before providing the utterances that are used to create the user profile,” the iPhone maker argues. “Thus, with respect to the user profile, users have the ‘power to say no’ intended by BIPA.”

The motion also notes that handwritten signatures and physical documents are not required by BIPA, and says that the complaint recognizes the consent process for its fingerprint and facial recognition technology without explaining why the process for its voice biometrics fail to meet the threshold.

Facebook settled a BIPA class action for a record-high $550 million last week, but its defense strategy was based on whether the plaintiff had legal standing, not a claim that the statutory requirements were in fact met.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Alan Goode offers insights on booming transitional IDV market on BU Podcast

Technology is transforming identity verification. According to Alan Goode of Goode Intelligence, by 2030, digital identity verification will pass traditional…

 

Share less data in more places: inching towards decentralized digital ID for travel

The travel industry is slowly shifting to a more decentralized model of digital identity. This was one of the key…

 

Clearview takes fresh legal hits over Canada class action, UK fine

Few biometrics companies have taken a bigger regulatory and legal beating than Clearview AI. It has already been a rough…

 

Mexico makes biometric identifier mandatory for all citizens

Mexico has officially introduced a digital identification system by signing a law that turned the previously optional biometric-based citizen code…

 

MOSIP highlights the UN DPI Safeguards Initiative

The United Nations’ DPI Safeguards Initiative has released 259 recommendations designed to guide regulators, advocates, donors, technology providers and governments…

 

Brazil adopts DaaS for verifiable credentials

Brazil is the latest country to adopt DPI as a Packaged Solution (DaaS) — a practical framework designed to accelerate…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events