FB pixel

Disclose facial recognition in discovery, no live biometric surveillance: City police chiefs

Disclose facial recognition in discovery, no live biometric surveillance: City police chiefs
 

The use of facial recognition technology in criminal investigations should be included in discovery disclosures made by police departments during criminal trial processes, according to a police chiefs’ policy group. In general, the chiefs say, live facial recognition should not be used.

The 46-page ‘Facial Recognition Technology in Modern Policing – Recommendations and Considerations’ report was produced by the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), an organization representing police executives from dozens of the largest cities in the U.S. and Canada.

The reports’ 13 key recommendations fall under the familiar headings of “transparency,” “accountability” and “responsibility,” but the specific points depart significantly from universal practice.  How far they depart from common practice is more difficult to immediately tell, but would become easier if the suggestions under “transparency” are followed.

Those include public and government engagement by any agency looking to procure face biometrics, and collection of data about the eventual outcomes of investigations in which facial recognition is used.

Limiting access to the biometric technology to trained specialists not directly involved in the investigation, and specific documentation of potential leads generated with facial recognition are among the key accountability recommendations. The responsibility guidance urges a privacy-conscious approach to gallery creation, along with common best practice recommendations like the inclusion of a secondary examiner.

What is likely the report’s most striking guidance is not mentioned in the summary of key recommendations, but is bolded in the document, where the MCCA writes that best practice for law enforcement with real-time facial recognition surveillance “is to not utilize FRT in this manner except under the most exigent of circumstances or when explicitly permitted under legal authority (e.g., court order).”

The report goes on to address myths and misconceptions around the biometric technology, making reference to NIST FRVT findings, including on demographic differences and bias and an ITIF analysis, and discuss program design and management, and technical evaluation of facial recognition technology.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

The UK’s election may spell out the future of its national ID cards

Identity cards are back among the UK’s top controversial topics – thanks to the upcoming elections and its focus on…

 

Challenges in face biometrics addressed with new tech and research amid high stakes

Big biometrics contracts and deals were the theme of several of the stories on that drew the most interest from…

 

Online age verification debates continue in Canada, EU, India

Introducing age verification to protect children online remains a hot topic across the globe: Canada is debating the Online Harms…

 

Login.gov adds selfie biometrics for May pilot

America’s single-sign on system for government benefits and services, Login.gov, is getting a face biometrics option for enhanced identity verification…

 

BIPA one step closer to seeing its first major change since 2008 inception

On Thursday, a bipartisan majority in the Illinois Senate approved the first major change to Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act…

 

Identity verification industry mulls solutions to flood of synthetic IDs

The advent of AI-powered generators such as OnlyFake, which creates realistic-looking photos of fake IDs for only US$15, has stirred…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events