FB pixel

FaceTec objects to Jumio’s replacement law firm in liveness IP dispute

FaceTec objects to Jumio’s replacement law firm in liveness IP dispute
 

FaceTec is not saying Jumio can’t have legal representation in a dispute over IP for biometric liveness detection, just not the firm it had before, or the replacement it has chosen.

The 3D face biometrics developer has filed a motion opposing Jumio’s selection of a replacement for Perkins Coie, after the law firm was disqualified and Jumio was ordered by the court to replace it.

The law suit stems from an alleged patent violation by iProov, and the use of iProov’s biometric liveness detection by Jumio after it switched from using FaceTec’s ZoOm.

Jumio has requested a status conference to name Morrison Foerster as its representation.

But the firm is not “new,” FaceTec argues. Instead, FaceTec describes Morrison Foerster in the motion as “Perkins previous co-counsel,” alleging it represented Jumio in the same case for “approximately two months.”

Morrison Foerster Partner Kenneth Kuwayti approached FaceTec’s representation in June, 2024 in his capacity as Jumio’s lead counsel in arbitration. He told FaceTec’s lawyer that he was representing Jumio in requesting an extension to respond to the litigation, and that his firm was awaiting a decision from Jumio on whether it would represent the biometrics provider at trial. Two other attorneys with Morrison Foerster also appeared as Jumio counsel before Perkins arrived on the scene in August.

The Answer and Counterclaims filed by Jumio on August 23, 2024 listed both law firms.

FaceTec says Jumio did not meet or confer with it prior to filing its administrative motion, according to the court document, and has not complied with the court order.

“Jumio here plainly seeks to rely on the abbreviated administrative motion procedures to improperly hamstring FaceTec’s ability to properly raise this issue to the Court through a properly noticed motion and supporting briefing,” the filing by FaceTec (shared by Bloomberg Law) states.

FaceTec is seeking a “properly briefed motion” and an extension of the disqualification to include Morrison Foerster.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ambitious biometrics projects need clear roles for success

Biometrics technology development has long been the fixed domain of experts, and while public bodies like NIST have played a…

 

Who holds the keys to digital sovereignty? It might not be who you think

As governments think more about digital identity as a pillar of digital public infrastructure, and therefore a matter of vital…

 

Nigeria wades into social media age assurance debate with pubic survey

A survey has been released by the Nigerian Data Protection Commission to gather feedback on the proposed regulation of a…

 

Spain’s Digital Transformation Ministry backs Sybol with €500k

A Spanish digital transformation agency is helping to fund digital identity development and verifiable credentials. The Spanish Society for Technological…

 

Ethiopia’s digital ID joins sovereign wealth fund as weekly enrollments reach 1M

Ethiopia is accelerating its efforts to reach 90 million digital ID enrollments this year, with the National ID Program (NIDP)…

 

Vendors push deeper into high assurance identity verification

Digital identity vendors are accelerating product integrations as businesses look for stronger, more seamless ways to verify users across sectors….

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events