FB pixel

FaceTec objects to Jumio’s replacement law firm in liveness IP dispute

FaceTec objects to Jumio’s replacement law firm in liveness IP dispute
 

FaceTec is not saying Jumio can’t have legal representation in a dispute over IP for biometric liveness detection, just not the firm it had before, or the replacement it has chosen.

The 3D face biometrics developer has filed a motion opposing Jumio’s selection of a replacement for Perkins Coie, after the law firm was disqualified and Jumio was ordered by the court to replace it.

The law suit stems from an alleged patent violation by iProov, and the use of iProov’s biometric liveness detection by Jumio after it switched from using FaceTec’s ZoOm.

Jumio has requested a status conference to name Morrison Foerster as its representation.

But the firm is not “new,” FaceTec argues. Instead, FaceTec describes Morrison Foerster in the motion as “Perkins previous co-counsel,” alleging it represented Jumio in the same case for “approximately two months.”

Morrison Foerster Partner Kenneth Kuwayti approached FaceTec’s representation in June, 2024 in his capacity as Jumio’s lead counsel in arbitration. He told FaceTec’s lawyer that he was representing Jumio in requesting an extension to respond to the litigation, and that his firm was awaiting a decision from Jumio on whether it would represent the biometrics provider at trial. Two other attorneys with Morrison Foerster also appeared as Jumio counsel before Perkins arrived on the scene in August.

The Answer and Counterclaims filed by Jumio on August 23, 2024 listed both law firms.

FaceTec says Jumio did not meet or confer with it prior to filing its administrative motion, according to the court document, and has not complied with the court order.

“Jumio here plainly seeks to rely on the abbreviated administrative motion procedures to improperly hamstring FaceTec’s ability to properly raise this issue to the Court through a properly noticed motion and supporting briefing,” the filing by FaceTec (shared by Bloomberg Law) states.

FaceTec is seeking a “properly briefed motion” and an extension of the disqualification to include Morrison Foerster.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Stop treating identity as a compliance step. It’s infrastructure now

By Harry Varatharasan, Chief Product Officer, ComplyCube The UK governmentʼs digital identity consultation is closing, and for most commentators, this…

 

If you build it, they will leave: experts warn UK gov’t on digital ID approach

The UK Cabinet Office’s consultation on digital identity closed on Tuesday, Digital systems built by governments tend to decline over…

 

Shufti biometric PAD clears iBeta Level 3 with 0 errors across iOS, Android

London-based global identity verification and fraud prevention provider Shufti has passed a Level 3 evaluation of its biometric Presentation Attack…

 

OpenID draft spec for extended identity claims assurance up for approval

Voting is open for approval of a draft specification to extend OpenID Connect to cover new features for requesting and…

 

EES troubles ignite speculation of further suspensions

Crowds, chaos and cranky travelers: The EU’s biometric border management scheme, the Entry-Exit System (EES), continues to fill headlines as…

 

UK Home Office eyes suppliers for SCBP biometrics platform

The Home Office is hosting a preliminary market engagement event to engage with potential suppliers for two not-yet-guaranteed future procurements…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events